San Francisco Trip 2011

Myka and I celebrated our 5th anniversary with a weekend trip to SF. I made a PDF Slideshow of some of our photos, but that won't upload here, so please enjoy this video I put together on iMovie of the disjointed clips I shot here and there.

I know we live in a world where people have phones with 8mp cameras that shoot 1080i video, but I've been lugging around an enormous 8mp DSLR made in 2005 with no video capability for years and just got a camera that does video (and it's only 720p video, so a side feature your phone still beats the height of my technology) and was messing around at a few points here and there in a sort of, "Dude, this thing actually takes video!" kind of way.

I had the tourist with the big SLR bit down, but I was reluctant to embrace tourist walking around taking pointless videos of stuff persona (I'm not a 38 year old Asian after all). So most of my videoing was done in places where no one would notice.

Speaking of taking on identities with gadgets, I was driving, so I asked Myka to run the camera while we approached the Golden Gate. We don't have any kids yet, but since we got married, Myka has wholeheartedly embraced the "Mom who pretends she's too dumb with electronics to even turn on the TV unless she's alone" persona.

I had to plead with her before she would agree to hold the camera, but the joke was on me. When I watched the video I saw that she decided to prove her incompetence by choosing not point the camera at the bridge while we approached it. Once we got on the bridge, she dropped the lens cap on the floor of the car, pointed the camera at the dashboard while she frantically looked for the cap as if it were a grenade with the pin pulled.

Of course, she claims it was all an accident and "I didn't know what to do."

I think you can hear me yelling at her over the music I dubbed on it.

Anyway, here it is:

Too Soon?

I hate to get myself longing for College Football before the NBA Finals are even over, but I picked up my copy of Phil Steele's 2011 College Football Preview today.

Looking it over tonight, it's funny how much nostalga I have for the era of Utah football that it seems just ended.

Phil does Bowl projections in each year's magazine which, of course, are almost never correct, but are an excellent idea of where teams stand going into the season.

Utah has gone to a Bowl every year since 2003 and 10 of the last 12 years. I looked for Utah in the bowl projections and was stunned that I did not find them.

I didn't project Utah to be world beaters this season, but no bowl at all? So I looked to see, how many Pac-10 teams go to bowls? So I checked the bowl histories and last year it was only 4 teams. By comparison, 5 Mtn. West teams bowled in the 2010 season. And that's in a smaller conference.

So on the surface, Utah's chances of going to a bowl went from 5/9 to 4/12. Ouch. And that's to say nothing of the lack of UNLVs and Colorado State's on the schedule. I'm worried about a rude awakening for Utah athletics this year.

I wish USC could go to a bowl.

Pippen's Blasphemy

Scottie Pippen stated the obvious on a sports radio show today by saying that LeBron has become a greater player than Michael Jordan by combining the ability to score at will with an uncanny ability to involve teammates and make everyone around him better.

Since that moment this morning, people who watched Pippen from their couches are lining up to scream at him (to be fair, Stephen A. Smith really only has two volumes) for desecrating the figure that every basketball fan is required to worship.

There's only one problem with everyone killing Pippen.

Not only is everything Pippen said true, it's pretty obvious. LeBron isn't referred to as "The Chosen One" for nothing. As Bill Simmons said, he is Michael's scoring ability with Magic's court vision wrapped up in Karl Malone's body. He's like nothing basketball or even sport has ever seen.

Pippen was careful to say that Jordan is the greatest scorer ever, but the fact is, LeBron can not only score like few in the game, but do everything else at an all-NBA level too.

Jordan's career scoring average was higher than LeBron's, but only by 2 points (30-28). In every other statistical category, LeBron outshines MJ. He already has more triple doubles in 7 seasons than Jordan had in 15.

The funny thing about this happening now is that there are tons of ads for a dumb new movie featuring this very argument. It's a guy from my generation screaming at a kid to convince him that Jordan is better because he has six championships, and nothing else in the argument is relevant.

Really? Championships are all that matters? Well then. I guess Steve Kerr was better than Reggie Miller, Luc Longley was better than Charles Barkley, Bill Cartwright was better than Patrick Ewing and Brian Scalabrene is better than Dwight Howard.

That argument is patently abused for two reasons:

1: Championships are team achievements and Jordan wouldn't have won any with the coach and teammates LeBron had in Cleveland.

2: Guess how many titles Jordan had at LeBron's age? ZERO! Jordan was 29 when he won his first title. LeBron is 26. Was it Jordan's fault he didn't win a title before the cusp of his 30's? Hardly seems that way. Jordan won 5 scoring titles before he was fitted for a championship ring and had back to back seasons where he averaged a ridiculous 37 and 35 ppg. He also won a well-deserved MVP. The Bull's failure to win a title in the late 80's was no more Jordan's fault than it was LeBron's fault he didn't win a title in Cleveland.

LeBron is on the cusp of winning an NBA Championship this year, which would put the titles before 30 count at an even 1-1 between the two players.

Will Lebron ever reach 6 championships like MJ? There's no way to know, but if I'm starting a team today, I'll take the guy who can just as easily score 40+ as deal out 14 assists and grab 18 rebounds. Why? Because we've never been able to say that about ANYONE else. I'm no fan of LeBron, but you'd have to be stupid or stubborn to deny that he truly is the Chosen One.

A foray into Hockey

I decided I'm going to try watching an NHL game for the first time in my life tonight. I went to NHL.com today and saw the Sharks are playing Vancouver. It's 6:00 so the game should be starting.

Step 1: Find the game. The NHL has a tv deal with NBC right?

6:01: NBC has a Family Feud marathon going. Maybe it's on one of the ESPNs?

6:03: College Softball, Boxing, and College Softball

6:05. There it is! It's on VS. I wonder what all the Bass Fishing fans will watch tonight?

6:06: We're live from the HP Pavilion! I loved watching the olympic hockey from Vancouver, and I decided that I was going to get into the NHL and the Blackhawks would be my favorite team.

I never actually tuned into a game, but nodded approvingly when I saw they won the championship, so my NHL fanship got off to a roaring start last year.

The Blackhawks are out so I'll revert to a time tested (I just made it up) rule for picking a side in a hockey team: root for the team from Canada. Since every hockey game I ever enjoyed was played in Vancouver, rooting for the Canucks seems appropriate.

6:11 Still no action, but I know that the series is tied 2-2.

6:12: We're off! Puck goes to one side, back to the other, and back to where it started. If I knew a single hockey fan, I would be calling him to ask what is going on.

6:14: The announcers say there's a penalty, but the refs don't blow the whistles for like 20 seconds. What? Also, no mention of what the penalty was. Are those random in hockey? Now San Jose has an extra man playing.

6:15: looks like the sharks are 3/3 on power plays in this series, so I guess they're going to score here in the next minute. Don't they only score like 3 goals a game in hockey? what did did the Vancouver guy do that was this horrible to essentially give the other team 1/3 of their points?

It seems like the basketball equivalent of this is a player committing a foul and the other team getting to shoot an open 22 footer worth 33 points.

6:17: There it is! San Jose scores on the power play. Still no mention of what the Vancouver guy did. Must have been like Ron Artest and Kermit Washington combined.

6:21: Offsides called. I guess I'll have to look up what that is.

6:25: Looks like icing says, you can't move into your attack zone ahead of the puck. So you have to flip the puck ahead and then go chase it? On every single possession? I'm starting to understand why this sport is on the bass fishing channel.

6:27: My wife just came in and I told her I'm watching my first ever NHL game. She said, "I'm disappointed. You're supposed to hate hockey."

PS: another mystery powerplay for the Sharks. I guess it's going to be 2-0

6:29: There it is. 2-0. What did vancouver do!? My score converter now has the score at the basketball equivalent of 66-0. We're only half way through the 1st period!

6:33: This is pretty physical. We had a little scuffle, but no fight. One of the things that appeals to me about hockey is the fighting. Not because I love watching fighting necessarily, but because sometimes, guys need to fight.

In the Celts last playoff series, I had to watch Dwayne Wade cheap shot Paul Pierce to get him ejected from game 1, and then break Rajon Rondo's arm in game 2. Someone should have punched him in the face. There is no debating this. So whey can't they do it? You would cut down on punk behavior and crowds would love it. I think it's because white people play hockey and black people play basketball.

Cry about it if you want, but white people are civilized, rational people who can punch each other in the face for a minute until someone hits the deck. Then the fight is over and it's settled.

If they let the NBA guys do this, posses would get involved and there would be gunfights after half the games. You might not like reading this, but you know it's true.

Still, someone needs to punch Dwayne Wade in the face.

6:39: I told my wife I'm making a blog post about this. She's furious. What were her exact words, I believe she told me that I'm being false to myself? Why can't I try to broaden my horizons?

6:45: Another goal, San Jose! atrick Marlow. He must be good because I'm pretty sure I've heard of him and he just scored on a one on one breakaway. That was exciting.

Even more exciting is that it's 99-0 on my basketball score converter, which means I can walk away from this after the 1st period.

6:49: Some furious action in Vancouver's attack zone for the 1st time of the game. A few shots, but nothing going in. No one ever explained the penalties, or why San Jose deserves 2 goals essentially for free, but they have dominated this 1st period. The action hardly ever left the Shark's attack zone.

6:51: End of the 1st, and at 99-0, I think this one is pretty much wrapped up. I'd call it a pretty efficient sports learning experience. Less than one hour and I learned about offsides and icing, and I can use terms like, "Attack Zone" in a sentence.

Even though it's Friday night (worst TV night of the week) I just took a cruise around my directv channel list and there are two things on I'd rather watch than the rest of this hockey game (River Monsters and The Simpsons). But I think I liked hockey enough to put it in my click-around rotation next time I see a game on. And until the McCourt drama ends, I'd probably as soon watch Hockey as the Dodgers.